Masked gunmen from Somalia’s al-Shabaab movement claim to be holding an unknown number of Kenyan Christians hostage after a dawn raid on a university compound that left at least 15 people dead.
The attackers stormed into the university shortly after 5am in the town of Garissa, about 90 miles from the volatile border with Somalia. Kenya’s national disaster operations centre said 280 of the university’s 815 students were accounted for but did not say how many it believed to be still inside.
The gunmen were in one of four residential buildings, the interior ministry said.
Arnolda Shiundu, a spokesman for the Kenya Red Cross (KRC), told the Guardian that the attackers set off a blast at the gate of the university hostels before storming the compound and taking hostages.
As many as 60 are wounded, according to witnesses. “We have evacuated about 30 casualties, most of them with bullet wounds. Four are in a critical state and Kenya defence forces personnel have airlifted three victims, including two soldiers, to Nairobi,” Shiundu said.
A mortuary attendant in Garissa said at least 15 people had been killed. Al-Shabaab claimed responsibility for the attack, saying it had released Muslims while killing some Christians and taking others hostage.
“We sorted people out and released the Muslims,” Sheikh Abdiasis Abu Musab, al-Shabaab’s military operations spokesman, told Reuters.
“There are many dead bodies of Christians inside the building. We are also holding many Christians alive. Fighting still goes on inside the college.”
Kenyan police have offered a $220,000 bounty for Mohammed Mohamud, who they believe is the mastermind of the attack. The Kenyan president, Uhuru Kenyatta, said the government has deployed security forces try to end the ongoing a hostage situation.
Witnesses said the attackers had shot indiscriminately at students
and teachers who had been woken up by the mayhem. “They are just
shooting randomly,” Augustine Alanga told the BBC World Service.
— #BanKhat (@AlinoorMB) April 2, 2015#BREAKING: Some of students who escaped #Garissa uni college attack report of warzone situation where gunmen stormed & went on killing spree
At least 50 students managed to escape to a nearby military facility after the initial sounds of gunfire and explosions, the KRC said. Witnesses described a scene of carnage with a huge crater left behind following the blast at the gate.
Collins Wetangula, the vice chairman of the student union, told the Associated Press he was preparing to take a shower when he heard gunshots coming from Tana dorm, which hosts both men and women. He said he locked himself and three roommates in their room.
“All I could hear were footsteps and gunshots nobody was screaming because they thought this would lead the gunmen to know where they are,” he said. “The gunmen were saying ‘sisi ni al-Shabaab’ (Swaihi for we are al-Shabaab),” Wetangula said.
When the gunmen arrived at his dormitory he could hear them opening doors and asking if the people who had hidden inside whether they were Muslims or Christians.
“If you were a Christian you were shot on the spot,” he said. “With each blast of the gun I thought I was going to die.”
The gunmen started to shoot rapidly and it was as if there was an exchange of fire, he said.
“The next thing, we saw people in military uniform through the window of the back of our rooms who identified themselves as the Kenyan military,” Wetangula said. The soldiers took him and around 20 others to safety.

Kenya’s new police chief, Joseph Boinett, who was appointed after the previous police commissioner was forced to retire following a spate of attacks in northern Kenya, said in a statement that police were “engaged in an elaborate process of flushing out the gunmen from the hostels”.
“I urge Kenyans to remain calm as our officers work to make sure that the attackers are ejected from the hostel and normalcy returns within the shortest time possible.”
— Joseph Boinnet (@JBoinnet) April 2, 2015Official report of current status vide Garissa attack. Thank you for your support. pic.twitter.com/I08RUALlFG
Kenya has been hit by a series of attacks blamed on al-Shabaab since its troops were deployed in Somalia in 2011 to tackle the al-Qaida affiliate. The UN-backed African Union troops have pushed al-Shabaab from virtually all major populated centres in the country but the rebels have hit back with a series of terror attacks in Somalia, Kenya and Uganda, another country contributing troops.
The four-day siege of the Westgate mall in Nairobi in September 2013 that left 67 dead was the most spectacular al-Shabaab atrocity so far, but the north of Kenya, which is primarily settled by Kenyan Somalis, has been the scene of a string of attacks, including the massacre of dozens of bus passengers in November.
Britain and Australia issued travel advisories warning against all travel to the north of Kenya and Coast province last week. The tourism industry, the biggest source of employment in Coast, has been seriously affected by falling arrival numbers as a result the attacks.

North-east Kenya is one of the most impoverished parts of the
country, where residents blame the state for years of marginalisation
that has made the region an easy target for al-Shabaab operations and
recruitment.
Efforts have been made to reverse the economic depredations in the area. The university, opened in 2011, is one of the key projects the government has rolled out. It has a student population of about 900, many of them from other parts of the country.
The pattern in other al-Shabaab attacks in recent years has been for the militants to separate Christians from Muslims and kill them at close range.
View all comments >
comments (522)
Sign in or create your Guardian account to join the discussion.
This discussion is closed for comments.
We’re doing some maintenance right now. You can still read comments, but please come back later to add your own.
Commenting has been disabled for this account (why?)
Religious nut-jobs strike again. What in the world is going on?
islamic nut-jobs strike again!!!
I wonder why the Muslims students who were studying side by side with their Christian peers weren't on a murder rampage, seeing as, according to you, Islam is behind this. But let's ignore them. They don't fit in to your black & white narrative.
Hope all the poor innocent students who are still alive make it out unhurt. What a terrible sadistic world we live in.
You can copy and paste that comment all you want, it's still whataboutery.
Can somebody more au fait with the Guardian style guide explain to me why these are militants and not jihadi extremists?
That would be deemed racist!!
+ 1
Militants is now a reserved term for posh people with Oxbridge degrees who raise awareness about issues via Twitter campaigns.
Are there no depths to which al-shabaab won't sink? Somalia is desperately trying to get back on its feet, and they're determined to make Kenyan innocents suffer too. Appalling.
Stability is their enemy, chaos and poverty their biggest recruiting aids. Religion is only a tool. This is all about personal power for the leaders of these groups.
I happened to be Somali and live in Kenya as well and clearly these people don't represent what I stand for. But as long as Isis, Boko Haram, Houthis etc continue what ever they doing, I and many more like me will be nothing but scapegoats.
No, religion is their motivation. A religion that cannot accept alternative world-views and cannot negotiate except through violence.
After all, by any measure Sharia states are inferior to the West.
This is utterly dreadful.
Reading this just makes me sick to my stomach. I cannot fathom what sort of world these barbarians live in, where they think it is okay to take someone's life because they identify as Christian, or Muslim, or anything else.they think it is okay to take someone's life because they identify as Christian, or Muslim, or anything else.
Er.. no, 'Muslim' is OK, but "anything else" is marked for death.
Yup, they freed the Muslims and slaughtered the Christians while shouting Allah Hu Ackbar in order to underline the fact that this has nothing to do with Islam.
They are not "militants".
If The Guardian offices were to be attacked and your journalists and staff killed, would they be "militants"?
They are terrorists, full stop.
more appropriately religious puritan gangsters
If The Guardian offices were to be attacked ...
As if that would ever happen ...
Clear evidence that 'NE Region/ Northern Frontier District', has never been a part of the old British 'Kenya Colony', or 'Independent Kenya'.
Its mainly Somali natives have never fully accepted being detached from Greater Somalia to act like a buffer zone for 'Kenya' ,since Europe's notorious "Scramble for Africa". Remember the resistance put up by 'The Mad Mullah'?
So, in short, it's Britain's fault.
Somehow, I knew it would be.
All Britain's fault and nothing to do with Islam.
Why are there so many posters on the Guardian who struggle with basic comprehension?
When did the poster above blame Britain?
I guess the phrase "since Europe's notorious "Scramble for Africa"" and talk of British colonialism kind of makes that point. You're right, it could just be a misunderstanding, that may not be the point that FH Dar was making, but it's understandable if that's what people think.
ahh, can you just feel the tolerance?
al-Shabaab - intolerant ?
I thought it was western democracies who are intolerant?
At least thats the message being pumped out by certain sections of the left wing commentariat whenever a disaffected young Jihadi buys a one way ticket to the caliphate.
Really? Where?
Where? - well, lets with the daily mantra on Graun discussion boards that everything that ever has happened or will happen is simply a bi-product of US foreign policy.
And that the violence, while regrettable has somehow been brought upon ourselves because of the war, or because of the experience of some muslims in Europe, especially those who feel their religious outlook is not afforded sufficient respect.
At the heart of it (in my opinion) is a near steadfast refusal by sections of the left commentariat to look critically at the relationship between doctrine and actions.
In fact until recently any such criticism was swiftly removed from certain discussion boards because it did not fit with the prescribed narrative - to a certain extent there may have been a lack of comprehension regarding the form such violence took (murdering children, suicide bombers, kidnapping large groups of women, gunning down cartoonists, etc).
The latest appalling yet unsurprising incident makes it increasingly obvious that the time to tackle this ideology head on is long overdue, and liberal self loathing should not get in the way of this task.
Horrible - but I'll bet nobody is surprised?
Certain groups, and individuals who buy into their violent ideology seem to be in a terrorist competition for the most revolting act of the year award - it won't be an easy one to call given targets have ranged from schoolchildren and young women to cartoonists and now christian students.
The sooner Kenya fully secures its boarder with Somalia the better. The mooted fence is one option, but maybe AP mines could be considered given the need for a rapid solution? (Ducks for cover....)
I just can't see it working.
Ejok! by the way. Spent a lot of time out in Turkana.
I am with lentoon, just can't see it working, a border that size.
Might be a bit difficult, maybe they shouldn't have signed and ratified the Ottawa Treaty, outlawing AP mines. Not to mention the technical difficulties in mining a border that long, and the fact that if al-whatever have people who regularly use them then there's a good chance that you'd be providing them with a readily available supply of explosives (on a defuse-and-take-away basis).
Guardian - The apologists for Islamic terrorism !
Pardon??????? Can you give us an example?
The situation between Al-Shabab and Kenya is significantly more complicated than Islamic terrorism vs Everyone else, it's got a hell of a long history stretching back to pre-independence. Its well worth understanding the context - as this article attempts to do - to understand the conflict.
If you read the Guardian regularly you would have lots of examples.
There's a lot of disaffected Somali refugees living in Kenya at the moment, and a hazy border where groups can be Kenyan or Somalian (depending on who's asking). Al Shabab is growing stronger and bolder in attacking, and Kenyan reprisals, while better than the historical record Kenya has in dealing with Somalian terrorists, are poorly targeted and fairly arbitrary.
While fundamentalist Islam is the religion and belief system of the terrorists here, it should be seen in a much, much wider and longer history of Kenya/Somalia border tension, conflict and mutual violence.
Sadly I can only see this conflict escalating.
I can't help but feel that the conflict with militant Islamism is rapidly becoming the defining conflict of this generation, yet still there are people who try to downplay it, or pretend that if we ignore it it might just go away.
It won't go away. We in the civilised world (and that includes the majority of the world's Muslims) need to recognise that collectively a lot of time and a lot of money is going to have to be spent defeating it. The consequences for shying away from this fight are dire.
I don't see anyone shying away from a fight. But a "fight" like this is never going to be won with bombs and invading other countries. It was precisely the illegal invasion of Iraq by the US that created the conditions for the rise of IS, for example. And after more than a decade of war in Afghanistan, in which millions of people were killed, the Taliban is stronger than ever. It is precisely the West's war-mongering and hypocritical preaching to the world that is fueling Islamic fundamentalism worldwide.
I'm afraid this simply isn't true. The Taliban is not 'stronger than ever' in Afghanistan. It used to run the country; it has now been weakened to the point that it was unable to disrupt last year's presidential election, the turnout of which was high despite Taliban threats. The Taliban has, in other words, been both weakened by the military campaign against it and overwhelmingly repudiated by the population of Afghanistan.
Islamism is essentially a fascist ideology and consequently war with it is inevitable. I'll use the Taliban again as an example, who would surely have brought war to Afghanistan no matter what - indeed, Iran was almost moved to invade in the 1990s following this incident. We can't shy away from this; as I say, fail to meet a group like IS with a military response and they aren't going to go away.
In any case, your final point is a nonsense. Western warmongering is what motivates Al-Shabaab to enter a Kenyan University and massacre Christians? How, exactly? For all its crimes, the United States can hardly be held accountable for a mad group's attempts to wipe out Christianity in East Africa. This kind of thinking is in danger of at best excusing and at worst legitimising the actions of Islamists. It does their victims, past and future, a massive disservice.
when you get in bed with the US and become a foot soldier for them, there is no way you will find peace: just like the rest of the foot soldiers of Africa. Kenya, Nigeria, Egypt, Libya, these countries will never find peace as long as they keep those corrupt servants of Washington.
So you condone this behaviour, it seems. It is all the fault of everyone else except the perpetrators.
What evidence do you have that any of the Christians taken hostage by these death-worshiping fascists had got into bed with the US?
So it's America's fault that terrorists went into a university, separated the Muslims and Christians and started killing the Christians?
Have some backbone and put the blame where it lies for God's sake.
Hopefully, the Kenyan police and military units responding to this crisis can do better than the dreadful response to the Westgate massacre. That was a massive debacle and farce that took days to resolve, and even now, it's unclear if any of the Westgate gunmen survived. They may have.
Don't mention the gorilla in the room. Ayaan Hirsi Ali could quite clearly explain this series of events, except it might offend the sensibilities of those who wish to overturn the very document that all our human rights rest upon- The Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
It is time to speak up for non-Muslims.
The women who got thrown out of the Netherlands for lying about her past you mean?
Believe me, the Kenyan government will launch some kind of violent response as soon as it possibly can, don't be alarmed. The Gorilla in the room is very much present, you're talking about Al-Shabab, a well known Islamic terrorist group.
Noone is trying to hide the fact that this is Islamic terrorism, at all. It doesn't need to be said when it's Al Shabab for christssake.
"Time to speak up for non-Muslims" - Britain and the US and Kenya have been doing that with bombs and bullets and machetes for about 14 years, remember? Is that what you want? A bloody reprisal? A purge?
Some kind of action that will produce ever more difficulties, provoke ever more violence?
Yep, shoot the messenger why don't you.
there is a difference from religious puritan gangsters and the rest of the sheep who attend church/temple/synagogue/mosque.
Perhaps, but how come we never see mass demonstrations by those sheep saying 'not in my name' when these atrocities occur? They're happening every day now, and soon we will become immune to their impact. It will be just a case of 'Oh it's Islamic terrorists slaughtering yet more innocent victims. So, what's new?'